The efficacy of deadlifts performed using a Smith machine, as opposed to free weights, is a frequently debated topic in strength training. Smith machine deadlifts involve a guided barbell that moves along a fixed vertical path. This differs from conventional deadlifts, which require the lifter to stabilize the barbell and control its path.
The fixed movement pattern of the Smith machine can reduce the activation of stabilizer muscles, potentially limiting overall strength development and carryover to functional movements. However, it can offer a perceived sense of safety for novice lifters and may allow for heavier loads to be lifted in a controlled environment. Understanding the biomechanical differences between these two variations is crucial for maximizing training outcomes. Historically, the Smith machine has been used for various exercises, but its application to deadlifts has generated considerable discussion regarding its effectiveness for building overall strength and power.
This article will delve deeper into the advantages and disadvantages of Smith machine deadlifts, comparing them with conventional deadlifts, exploring the biomechanics involved, and offering practical guidance on their appropriate application within a training program.
1. Muscle Activation
Muscle activation patterns differ significantly between Smith machine and conventional deadlifts, impacting overall effectiveness. Conventional deadlifts require substantial engagement of stabilizer muscles in the core, back, and legs to control the barbell’s path. This contributes not only to greater strength gains in these muscles but also to improved overall functional strength. Smith machine deadlifts, due to the fixed bar path, reduce the demand on these stabilizers. Consequently, while prime movers like the gluteus maximus and hamstrings are still activated, the reduced stabilizer engagement may limit overall strength development and transferability to real-world movements. For example, an athlete performing a clean and jerk will benefit more from the enhanced core stability developed through conventional deadlifts than from the potentially greater load lifted using a Smith machine.
Research suggests that electromyographic (EMG) activity in certain stabilizer muscles, such as the erector spinae, is lower during Smith machine deadlifts compared to conventional deadlifts. This reduced activation can limit the development of crucial core strength, which is essential for various athletic movements and injury prevention. While the Smith machine may allow individuals to lift heavier loads, this does not necessarily translate to greater overall strength or muscle growth if key stabilizer muscles are not adequately stimulated. This difference in muscle activation patterns underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate exercise variation based on individual training goals and priorities.
Understanding muscle activation patterns is crucial for optimizing training outcomes. While Smith machine deadlifts may have a place in certain training programs, particularly for individuals with specific limitations or goals, they are unlikely to fully replicate the benefits of conventional deadlifts regarding overall strength and functional performance. The reduced stabilizer activation in Smith machine deadlifts highlights the importance of incorporating free-weight exercises into training programs for comprehensive strength development and injury prevention.
2. Stabilizer Engagement
Stabilizer muscle engagement forms a critical component in evaluating Smith machine deadlift effectiveness. Conventional deadlifts necessitate significant engagement of stabilizer muscles throughout the core, back, and legs to maintain balance and control the barbell’s trajectory. This activation contributes significantly to overall strength development and functional movement capacity. Conversely, the Smith machine’s guided bar path restricts frontal and sagittal plane movement, thereby reducing the demand on these stabilizer muscles. This diminished engagement can limit the development of crucial core strength and stability, potentially hindering functional strength gains and increasing the risk of injury when performing complex, multi-planar movements outside of the controlled Smith machine environment.
Consider the example of a firefighter lifting a heavy object during a rescue operation. The inherent instability of the real-world scenario requires significant core stabilization and control, abilities developed through exercises like conventional deadlifts. While a firefighter might lift heavier loads on a Smith machine, the reduced stabilizer engagement might not translate effectively to the dynamic and unpredictable demands of the job. Similarly, athletes in sports like basketball or soccer rely heavily on core stability for rapid changes in direction and explosive movements. The limited stabilizer activation during Smith machine deadlifts might not adequately prepare these athletes for the dynamic demands of their respective sports. This difference in stabilizer engagement underscores the importance of exercise selection for optimal performance enhancement and injury prevention.
In summary, while Smith machine deadlifts might offer a perceived sense of safety and potentially allow for lifting heavier loads, the reduced stabilizer engagement compared to conventional deadlifts presents a significant limitation. This reduced activation can hinder the development of functional strength crucial for real-world activities and athletic performance. Therefore, incorporating exercises that challenge stabilizer muscles, such as conventional deadlifts, remains essential for comprehensive strength development and injury prevention. Understanding the role of stabilizer engagement is crucial for making informed decisions about exercise selection and maximizing training outcomes.
3. Injury Risk
Injury risk is a crucial factor when evaluating the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts. While the fixed bar path may offer a perceived sense of security, it can also contribute to potential injuries. The restricted movement pattern of the Smith machine can force the lifter into unnatural biomechanical positions, potentially stressing the lower back, knees, and shoulders. This is particularly relevant when lifting heavier loads, as the Smith machine’s guided movement can mask underlying weaknesses in form and stability. Conversely, conventional deadlifts, while demanding greater control and balance, allow for natural adjustments in movement, potentially reducing the risk of injury from forced positioning. For example, a lifter with limited ankle mobility might experience knee strain during Smith machine deadlifts due to the fixed bar path, whereas conventional deadlifts allow for subtle adjustments in foot placement and stance to accommodate individual biomechanics. This adaptability can minimize stress on vulnerable joints.
Furthermore, the Smith machine’s guided movement can create a false sense of confidence, potentially leading lifters to overestimate their capabilities and lift heavier weights than they can safely handle with proper form. This can increase the risk of acute injuries, such as muscle strains or tears. Additionally, the reduced engagement of stabilizer muscles during Smith machine deadlifts can contribute to long-term imbalances and increase the susceptibility to injuries during other activities. For instance, weak core muscles resulting from limited stabilizer activation during Smith machine training can increase the risk of lower back pain during everyday movements like lifting a box or twisting. In contrast, the enhanced core stability developed through conventional deadlifts provides a protective effect against such injuries. This highlights the importance of considering long-term injury prevention when evaluating the effectiveness of different deadlift variations.
In summary, while the Smith machine may appear to offer a safer alternative, the restricted movement pattern and potential for developing muscle imbalances can present unique injury risks. Conventional deadlifts, by promoting natural movement patterns and engaging stabilizer muscles, contribute to better overall joint stability and long-term injury prevention. A comprehensive assessment of injury risk considers not only acute injuries but also the long-term implications of muscle imbalances and movement restrictions. Therefore, understanding the potential risks associated with each variation is crucial for making informed training decisions and maximizing long-term health and performance.
4. Functional Strength
Functional strength, the ability to perform real-world movements efficiently and safely, plays a crucial role in evaluating the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts. While Smith machine deadlifts can contribute to muscle strength gains, their impact on functional strength is often debated. This discussion centers around the Smith machine’s restricted movement pattern and its potential limitations in developing the integrated, multi-planar strength required for activities outside the gym.
-
Real-World Application
Functional strength translates directly to everyday activities like lifting groceries, climbing stairs, or pushing a heavy object. Conventional deadlifts, by requiring stabilization and control throughout the entire movement, enhance this real-world strength. The Smith machine’s guided movement, while potentially allowing for greater weight, limits the development of these crucial stabilizing muscles. For example, lifting a heavy box requires core stability and coordinated muscle activation, skills developed more effectively through conventional deadlifts than through the restricted movement of the Smith machine.
-
Multi-Planar Movement
Functional movements rarely occur in a single plane of motion. Activities like playing sports or performing manual labor often involve complex, multi-planar movements requiring coordinated muscle activation across multiple joints. Conventional deadlifts engage muscles in multiple planes, contributing to this multi-planar strength development. The Smith machine’s fixed vertical path restricts movement primarily to the sagittal plane, potentially limiting the development of strength and coordination required for more complex, multi-directional movements. This can be observed in sports like tennis, where serving requires coordinated rotational and lateral movements, abilities not fully developed through the linear motion of the Smith machine deadlift.
-
Injury Prevention
Functional strength plays a significant role in injury prevention. Strong stabilizer muscles, developed through exercises like conventional deadlifts, protect joints and reduce the risk of injury during everyday activities and athletic movements. The Smith machine’s reduced stabilizer engagement can leave individuals vulnerable to injuries when performing complex movements outside the controlled gym environment. For instance, a weak core resulting from limited stabilizer activation during Smith machine training can increase the risk of lower back injuries during activities like shoveling snow or playing golf, which require dynamic trunk rotation and stability.
-
Neuromuscular Coordination
Functional strength relies heavily on neuromuscular coordination, the ability of the nervous system to efficiently recruit and activate the appropriate muscles for a given movement. Conventional deadlifts enhance neuromuscular coordination by requiring precise control and balance throughout the lift. The Smith machine’s guided movement reduces the demand on neuromuscular control, potentially limiting the development of this crucial aspect of functional strength. This difference is evident in activities like carrying a heavy suitcase up a flight of stairs, which requires precise coordination between leg muscles, core stabilizers, and grip strength, abilities more effectively developed through the complex coordination demands of conventional deadlifts.
In conclusion, while Smith machine deadlifts can contribute to muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in specific muscle groups, their limitations in developing stabilizer muscles, multi-planar strength, and neuromuscular coordination raise questions about their overall effectiveness in enhancing functional strength. Conventional deadlifts, by engaging these crucial components of functional movement, offer a more comprehensive approach to strength training for real-world applications and injury prevention. Therefore, when prioritizing functional strength development, conventional deadlifts often prove more beneficial than their Smith machine counterparts.
5. Movement Pattern
Movement pattern analysis provides crucial insight into the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts. The Smith machine’s guided vertical path fundamentally alters the deadlift’s movement pattern, impacting muscle activation and overall training outcomes. Conventional deadlifts require complex coordination and stabilization, engaging multiple muscle groups across various planes of motion. The lifter must control the barbell’s path, resisting both horizontal and vertical forces. This necessitates significant activation of stabilizer muscles in the core, back, and legs, contributing to overall strength development and functional movement capacity. In contrast, the Smith machine’s fixed trajectory eliminates the need for this complex stabilization. The bar moves along a predetermined path, reducing the demand on stabilizer muscles and altering the distribution of load across primary movers. This altered movement pattern can affect the development of functional strength applicable to real-world activities that demand multi-planar movement and stabilization.
Consider the example of lifting a heavy object from the ground. This everyday task requires coordinated activation of leg, core, and back muscles to maintain balance and control the object’s trajectory. Conventional deadlifts mimic this movement pattern, enhancing the strength and coordination required for such activities. However, the Smith machine’s restricted movement limits the development of these crucial stabilizing muscles, potentially hindering performance in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, the fixed bar path of the Smith machine can force the lifter into potentially unnatural biomechanical positions, increasing the risk of injury, particularly when lifting heavier loads. For instance, individuals with limited ankle mobility might experience increased stress on the knees during Smith machine deadlifts due to the fixed vertical trajectory. Conventional deadlifts, on the other hand, allow for subtle adjustments in foot placement and stance, accommodating individual biomechanics and potentially reducing strain on vulnerable joints.
In summary, the movement pattern differences between Smith machine and conventional deadlifts have significant implications for training effectiveness. While the Smith machine may offer a perceived sense of safety and potentially allow for lifting heavier loads, the restricted movement pattern and reduced stabilizer activation limit its transferability to functional movements. Conventional deadlifts, by promoting natural movement patterns and engaging a wider range of muscle groups, offer a more comprehensive approach to strength development and functional performance enhancement. Understanding these biomechanical differences is essential for selecting the appropriate exercise variation based on individual training goals and priorities.
6. Weight Capacity
Weight capacity considerations play a significant role in evaluating the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts. The perception that greater weight capacity equates to greater effectiveness requires careful examination. While the Smith machine often allows individuals to lift heavier loads compared to conventional deadlifts, this increased capacity does not necessarily translate to superior strength or muscle development. The fixed bar path of the Smith machine reduces the demand on stabilizer muscles, allowing for heavier weights to be lifted with less overall effort. However, this reduced stabilizer engagement can limit the development of functional strength and hinder progress in other compound lifts.
-
Stabilizer Muscle Recruitment
Reduced stabilizer muscle recruitment is a critical factor when analyzing the impact of weight capacity on Smith machine deadlift effectiveness. Conventional deadlifts require substantial engagement of stabilizer muscles throughout the core, back, and legs to control the barbell’s path. This contributes to greater overall strength development and improved functional movement. The Smith machine, by guiding the bar along a fixed vertical path, diminishes the need for this stabilizer activation. Consequently, lifters can often handle heavier loads on the Smith machine, but this does not necessarily equate to greater overall strength gains or functional carryover. For example, an athlete performing a clean and jerk will benefit more from the enhanced core stability developed through conventional deadlifts than from the potentially heavier weight lifted using a Smith machine.
-
Movement Pattern Specificity
Movement pattern specificity significantly influences the relationship between weight capacity and effectiveness. Conventional deadlifts, by requiring the lifter to control the bar’s path, promote the development of strength and coordination specific to the deadlift movement. This specificity carries over to other functional movements that require similar muscle activation patterns. The Smith machine’s guided movement alters the deadlift’s natural biomechanics, potentially reducing the transferability of strength gains to other exercises or real-world activities. For instance, a powerlifter training for competition would likely benefit more from conventional deadlifts, as the specific strength and technique developed translate directly to the competitive lift.
-
Hypertrophy Potential
Hypertrophy potential, the capacity for muscle growth, is another factor to consider when evaluating the role of weight capacity. While the Smith machine may allow for heavier loads, the reduced stabilizer engagement and altered movement pattern can affect muscle activation and potentially limit overall hypertrophy. Conventional deadlifts, by engaging a wider range of muscle groups and promoting greater time under tension, can stimulate muscle growth more effectively, even with lighter loads. For example, a bodybuilder focused on maximizing muscle size in the back and legs might find conventional deadlifts more effective for stimulating hypertrophy, despite potentially lifting less weight compared to the Smith machine.
-
Long-Term Development
Long-term strength development hinges on progressively overloading muscles while maintaining proper form and minimizing injury risk. While the Smith machine might facilitate lifting heavier weights initially, the reduced stabilizer engagement can create muscle imbalances and limit long-term progress. Conventional deadlifts, by promoting balanced muscle development and enhancing core stability, provide a more sustainable foundation for long-term strength gains. For instance, an individual focused on overall fitness and longevity might benefit more from the balanced muscle development and reduced injury risk associated with conventional deadlifts, even if it means lifting lighter loads initially.
In conclusion, while the Smith machine’s increased weight capacity might appear advantageous, its impact on stabilizer engagement, movement pattern specificity, hypertrophy potential, and long-term development raises questions about its overall effectiveness compared to conventional deadlifts. The focus should not solely be on the weight lifted but rather on the quality of the movement, muscle activation patterns, and long-term training outcomes. A comprehensive approach to strength training considers these factors when selecting appropriate exercises and determining weight loads for optimal results.
7. Learning Curve
The learning curve associated with Smith machine deadlifts contributes significantly to the discussion surrounding their effectiveness. While often perceived as easier to learn due to the fixed bar path, the Smith machine can mask underlying technical deficiencies and create a false sense of mastery. This can hinder the development of proper deadlift technique and limit long-term strength progression. Conventional deadlifts, despite a steeper initial learning curve, necessitate developing fundamental movement skills, including balance, core stability, and proper hip hinging. Mastering these skills translates to greater functional strength and reduces the risk of injury in the long run. For example, a novice lifter might quickly lift heavier weights on the Smith machine, but this does not equate to proper deadlift technique. The guided movement can mask weaknesses in hip hinge mechanics and core stability, potentially leading to compensatory movement patterns and increased injury risk as weights increase. Conversely, a lifter focusing on conventional deadlifts from the outset develops a stronger foundation in proper technique, leading to more sustainable long-term progress.
Furthermore, the simplified movement pattern of the Smith machine can create a disconnect between perceived exertion and actual muscle activation. Lifters might feel they are working harder than they are, as the fixed bar path reduces the demand on stabilizer muscles. This can lead to plateaus in strength gains and limit the transferability of strength to other compound lifts and functional movements. Consider a lifter transitioning from Smith machine deadlifts to conventional deadlifts. They might find that the weight they could handle on the Smith machine significantly exceeds their capacity with free weights, highlighting the discrepancy in muscle activation and skill development between the two variations. This discrepancy underscores the importance of focusing on proper technique and progressive overload, rather than solely on weight lifted, for long-term strength development.
In conclusion, the seemingly shallower learning curve of Smith machine deadlifts can be deceptive. While initially easier to perform, the simplified movement can mask technical deficiencies and hinder the development of fundamental movement skills essential for long-term strength progression and injury prevention. Conventional deadlifts, despite a steeper initial learning curve, offer a more comprehensive approach to developing proper deadlift technique, enhancing functional strength, and promoting sustainable progress. Understanding the nuances of the learning curve associated with each variation is crucial for making informed decisions about exercise selection and maximizing training outcomes.
8. Training Goals
Training goals significantly influence the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts. The suitability of this exercise variation depends heavily on the individual’s specific objectives. For example, a bodybuilder primarily focused on muscle hypertrophy might find Smith machine deadlifts useful for isolating specific muscle groups, such as the quadriceps or hamstrings, particularly if free weight variations cause discomfort or limitations due to pre-existing injuries. The fixed bar path allows for greater control and isolation, potentially enhancing muscle growth in targeted areas. However, an athlete focused on developing functional strength for improved athletic performance would likely benefit more from conventional deadlifts. The complex coordination and stabilizer engagement required for conventional deadlifts translate more effectively to the dynamic demands of sports and other real-world activities. Consider a powerlifter; their training goals prioritize maximal strength in specific compound lifts. While the Smith machine might offer a higher weight capacity, the altered movement pattern and reduced stabilizer activation do not optimally prepare them for the demands of competition lifts like the conventional deadlift, squat, and bench press.
Understanding the interplay between training goals and exercise selection is crucial for maximizing results. If the goal is purely aesthetic, prioritizing muscle growth in specific areas, then Smith machine deadlifts might have a place in a training program. However, if the goal is to enhance functional strength, improve athletic performance, or build overall strength for compound lifts, conventional deadlifts generally offer a more effective approach. For instance, a fitness enthusiast seeking overall strength and improved functional capacity for everyday activities would benefit more from the comprehensive muscle activation and stabilizer engagement provided by conventional deadlifts. Furthermore, prioritizing proper movement patterns and minimizing injury risk necessitates a careful evaluation of training goals and the selection of appropriate exercise variations. The Smith machine, while potentially allowing for heavier loads, can increase the risk of injury due to its restricted movement pattern and potential for developing muscle imbalances if not implemented judiciously within a balanced training program.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts is highly contingent on individual training goals. While potentially useful for hypertrophy-focused training under specific circumstances, their limitations in developing functional strength and promoting optimal movement patterns make them less suitable for athletes, powerlifters, and individuals seeking overall strength and functional improvement. A thorough understanding of one’s training objectives is essential for selecting the most appropriate exercises and maximizing long-term training outcomes. Prioritizing functional strength, injury prevention, and long-term athletic development necessitates careful consideration of the limitations and potential benefits of each exercise variation within the context of individual goals. Therefore, aligning exercise selection with specific training goals is paramount for achieving desired results and minimizing potential risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the effectiveness of Smith machine deadlifts, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: Are Smith machine deadlifts suitable for beginners?
While the Smith machine’s fixed bar path may offer a perceived sense of safety, it can also mask proper form and hinder the development of essential stabilizing muscles. Beginners might benefit more from learning conventional deadlifts with lighter weights, focusing on proper technique and progressively increasing the load as strength and coordination improve.
Question 2: Can Smith machine deadlifts build muscle?
Smith machine deadlifts can contribute to muscle growth, particularly in targeted muscle groups like the quadriceps and hamstrings. However, the reduced activation of stabilizer muscles might limit overall strength development compared to conventional deadlifts.
Question 3: Are Smith machine deadlifts safer than conventional deadlifts?
The Smith machine’s guided movement can create a false sense of security. While it might reduce the risk of dropping the bar, the fixed bar path can force the lifter into unnatural positions, potentially increasing the risk of injury to the lower back, knees, and shoulders, especially with heavier loads.
Question 4: Can Smith machine deadlifts improve athletic performance?
The limited stabilizer activation and altered movement pattern of Smith machine deadlifts might not translate effectively to the dynamic demands of athletic movements. Conventional deadlifts, by engaging a wider range of muscles and promoting greater core stability, tend to be more beneficial for enhancing athletic performance.
Question 5: Should experienced lifters use the Smith machine for deadlifts?
Even experienced lifters should consider the potential limitations of Smith machine deadlifts. While they might have a place in certain training programs, such as for targeted muscle hypertrophy or as a variation during deload periods, conventional deadlifts generally offer greater benefits for overall strength development and functional performance.
Question 6: How do Smith machine deadlifts compare to other compound exercises?
Compared to other compound exercises like squats and bench presses, Smith machine deadlifts exhibit similar trade-offs. While potentially allowing for greater weight and isolation of specific muscles, they often compromise the development of stabilizer strength and functional movement patterns. A balanced training program should prioritize compound exercises that promote overall strength, stability, and functional movement.
Careful consideration of individual training goals, biomechanics, and potential risks is crucial when deciding whether to incorporate Smith machine deadlifts. Prioritizing proper form, progressive overload, and a balanced training program contributes to long-term strength development and injury prevention.
The following section will provide practical recommendations for incorporating deadlifts, both conventional and Smith machine variations, into a comprehensive training program.
Practical Tips for Deadlift Training
This section offers practical guidance for incorporating deadlifts into a training program, considering both conventional and Smith machine variations. Careful attention to form, progression, and individual needs is crucial for maximizing benefits and minimizing risks.
Tip 1: Prioritize Conventional Deadlifts: Conventional deadlifts offer superior benefits for overall strength development, functional movement, and athletic performance. They should form the foundation of any deadlift training program.
Tip 2: Master Proper Form: Correct form is paramount for maximizing benefits and preventing injuries. Focus on maintaining a neutral spine, engaging the core, and hinging at the hips. Consult with a qualified strength coach for personalized guidance.
Tip 3: Implement Progressive Overload: Gradually increase the weight, repetitions, or sets over time to stimulate continuous strength adaptation. Avoid increasing the load too quickly, as this can compromise form and increase injury risk.
Tip 4: Consider Individual Biomechanics: Adaptations to stance width, grip, and range of motion may be necessary to accommodate individual anatomical variations and limitations. Consult with a qualified professional for personalized recommendations.
Tip 5: Use Smith Machine Deadlifts Strategically: If incorporating Smith machine deadlifts, use them strategically. They can be beneficial for targeted muscle hypertrophy or as a variation during deload periods. However, they should not replace conventional deadlifts as the primary deadlift exercise.
Tip 6: Focus on Controlled Movements: Avoid jerky or uncontrolled movements, which can increase injury risk. Maintain a controlled tempo throughout both the concentric and eccentric phases of the lift.
Tip 7: Warm-up Thoroughly: Prepare the body for the demands of deadlifting with a thorough warm-up that includes dynamic stretches and lighter warm-up sets. This improves performance and reduces injury risk.
Tip 8: Listen to Your Body: Pay attention to any signs of pain or discomfort. Do not push through pain. Modify the exercise or seek professional guidance if necessary.
By adhering to these tips, individuals can maximize the benefits of deadlift training while minimizing risks. A well-structured program that emphasizes proper form, progressive overload, and individual needs contributes to long-term strength development and functional improvement.
The concluding section will summarize key takeaways and offer final recommendations for incorporating deadlifts into a balanced training program.
Conclusion
Analysis of Smith machine deadlifts reveals benefits and drawbacks compared to conventional deadlifts. While the Smith machine may offer a perceived sense of safety and potentially facilitate lifting heavier loads, limitations exist regarding functional strength development and overall efficacy. The fixed bar path reduces the demand on stabilizer muscles, potentially hindering the development of core strength and stability crucial for real-world movements and athletic performance. Furthermore, the altered movement pattern may not translate effectively to compound lifts and functional activities requiring multi-planar movement and coordination. While Smith machine deadlifts may have a place in certain training scenarios, such as targeted muscle hypertrophy or specific rehabilitation protocols, they should not replace conventional deadlifts as the cornerstone of a comprehensive strength training program. Conventional deadlifts, by engaging a wider range of muscle groups and promoting greater core stability, offer superior benefits for overall strength development, functional movement, and injury prevention.
Careful consideration of individual training goals, biomechanical factors, and potential risks is essential when determining the role of Smith machine deadlifts within a training regimen. Prioritizing proper form, progressive overload, and a balanced training program that incorporates a variety of functional movements remains paramount for achieving long-term strength gains, enhancing athletic performance, and minimizing the risk of injury. Further research exploring the long-term effects of Smith machine deadlifts on functional movement and injury prevalence would contribute valuable insights to this ongoing discussion within the strength and conditioning community.
